Legal Opinion

Crane Company v. Newman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 5, 1941No. 16,563PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevoss, J.

Appellee, plaintiff, brought this action against appellants, Crane Company and Eldon Welborn, etc., employee. Recovery was sought on the grounds of alleged negligence on the part of appellants in permitting appellee to walk into an elevator shaft at a time the elevator was not at said landing.

The specific grounds of negligence as charged in the complaint are as follows:

“1. That the defendants carelessly and negligently failed and omitted to maintain a light in front of said elevator.
“2. That the defendants carelessly and negligently opened the elevator gate and invited this plaintiff to enter…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. O'Meara v. HaidenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Bliss v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  3. Lumley v. Wabash R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  4. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. CauthenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Jacobson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Casey v. ProctorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Eickmann v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  3. Caudill v. CHATHAM MANUFACTURING COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Matter of Estate of PalamaraIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Stull v. DAVIDSONIndiana Court of Appeals · 1955

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API