Legal Opinion
United States v. Shaibu
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 14, 1990No. 88-5367PublishedCited by 146 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERGUSON, Circuit'Judge:
The defendant appeals from the District Court’s denial of his Motion to Suppress Evidence. California police officers searched his apartment after entering without a warrant. The police obtained evidence and statements from him which were used to support charges of bank fraud. Shafii Shaibu asserts all evidence and statements obtained during the search should be suppressed on two grounds: (1) the war-rantless entry into his apartment and ensuing search violated the Fourth Amendment; and (2) the police conducted a custodial interrogation without the warnings required…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by146 opinions
- Harolyn Pavao, as Special Administratrix of the Estate of Jon Webster Pavao v. John Pagay County of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Carlos Enrique Ramirez-ChilelCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Saleem Bashir v. Rockdale County, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Espinosa v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Augustin GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
141 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.