Reed v. Hamilton
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Tom Glaze, Justice.
Larry Reed filed this action for conversion against Paul Hamilton and Del Perry Ford, an automobile dealership in West Memphis. After Del Perry was dismissed with prejudice from the lawsuit, Hamilton was tried by a jury which returned a verdict in Reed’s behalf, finding Hamilton was 100% responsible for Reed’s damages in the amount of $2,100. The trial court set Reed’s verdict aside and Reed brings this appeal, claiming the trial court erred in doing so.
On June 25, 1990, Patsy Reed, Larry Reed’s wife, contacted Paul Hamilton, a fleet manager and new car manager of Del Perry…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Elliott v. HurstSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Clayton v. WagnonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
- McKenzie v. Tom Gibson Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Lancaster v. Schilling Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
3Cited by13 opinions
- McQuillan v. Mercedes-Benz Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Dent v. WrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Grayson v. Bank of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- National Hydro-Vac Industrial Services, L.L.C. v. Federal Signal Corp. (In Re National Hydro-Vac Industrial Services, L.L.C.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2004
- BBAS, INC. v. Marlin Leasing Corp.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.