Legal Opinion

Grayson v. Bank of Little Rock

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 9, 1998No. 98-149PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ray Thornton, Justice.

The principal question in this case is whether an attorney is liable for conversion for distributing the cash proceeds of a settlement agreement, which was subject to a security interest, when the secured party neither obtained a writ of garnishment nor an order of delivery. The appellants, Keith Grayson and Grayson & Grayson, P.A., were the attorneys for American Eagle Contracting Corporation (AECC) in a Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding. The appellee Bank of Little Rock (the Bank) held a perfected security interest in all of AECC’s corporate assets, including…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wallace v. BroylesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Pugh v. GriggsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. McQuillan v. Mercedes-Benz Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Davis v. WebberSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
  5. Porter v. HarshfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. The Stonebridge Collection v. Keith CarmichaelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  2. Roberts v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. National Bank of Commerce v. Dow Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Buck v. GillhamCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
  5. Schmidt v. StearmanCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API