Legal Opinion

McKenzie v. Tom Gibson Ford, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 2, 1988No. 87-363PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Justice.

Barbara McKenzie filed this action for conversion against Tom Gibson Ford, Inc., claiming compensatory and punitive damages for the alleged conversion of a check for $500 intended as a down payment on the purchase of a truck. At the close of Ms. McKenzie’s case, Gibson asked for a directed verdict on the grounds that Ms. McKenzie had failed to make a prima facie showing of conversion, had failed to prove conduct by Gibson which would entitle her to punitive damages and had failed to show that she suffered compensatory damages. The motion was denied, but at the close of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. HerringSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. First Nat. Bank of Brinkley v. FreySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  3. Northrup v. McGillMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Roach v. RectorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  5. Thomas v. WestbrookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Elliott v. HurstSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Edwards v. StillsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. McQuillan v. Mercedes-Benz Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Ciba-Geigy Corp. v. AlterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  5. Sexton Law Firm, P.A. v. MilliganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API