Legal Opinion

Yardley Created Products Co. v. Clopay Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 18, 1963No. 14144_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENOCH, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-appellee, Yardley Created Products Co. (sometimes hereinafter called “Yardley”), brought action in the United States District Court for declaratory judgment that Reissue Letters Patent Re. 25,112, owned by defendant-appellant, Clopay Corporation, (sometimes hereinafter called “Clopay”) is not infringed by the folding doors manufactured by Yardley, and is invalid and void. Clopay filed its answer and counterclaim denying the allegations of Yardley’s complaint and charging Yardley with infringement of Clopay’s patent.

On the basis of the pleadings, affidavits, a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The American Securit Company, a Corporation v. Hamilton Glass Company, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
  2. Vulcan Corporation v. INTERNATIONAL SHOE MACHINE CORPORATIONDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1946
  3. Collins v. KraftDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1956

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Warner and Swasey Company v. HeldDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1966
  2. Krampe v. Ideal Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
  3. Ethyl Corporation v. Borden, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  4. Hickory Springs Manufacturing Co. v. Fredman Bros. Furniture Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1971
  5. Sherman Car Wash Equipment Company v. Grand Car Wash, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API