Legal Opinion
Vulcan Corporation v. INTERNATIONAL SHOE MACHINE CORPORATION
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided January 31, 1946No. Civil Action 4373PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WYZANSKI, District Judge.
This case is before me on defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The ground of the motion is that the construction and operation of defendants’ shoe last, charged by the complaint to constitute an alleged infringement of Clausing Patent No. 2,065,655, have been agreed upon by the parties; that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact relating to the alleged infringement; and that defendants’ shoe last is not an infringement of said patent.
Plaintiff relies only on claim 1 of the patent in suit (R. 8). That claim is in these words:
“A longitudinally expansible…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Young v. Grand Rapids Refrigerator Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1920
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gustav H. Bobertz, Jr. v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
- Alex Lee Wallau, Inc. v. J. W. Landenberger & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- Helbush v. FinkleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- Brisk Waterproofing Co., Inc. v. A. Belanger & Sons, IncCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1954
- Kennametal, Inc. v. American Cutting Alloys, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.