Legal Opinion
Krampe v. Ideal Industries, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 26, 1972No. 71 C 47PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BAUER, District Judge.
This cause comes on the motion of defendant for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The action, arising under the patent laws of the United States, involves the alleged infringement by defendant of plaintiff’s patent for a swivel blade cable stripper. Jurisdiction is conferred by 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a).
Defendant’s motion is founded upon its assertion that plaintiff has so misused the patent in suit as to render it unenforceable. Plaintiff denies that he has misused the patent, contending further that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- National Lockwasher Co. v. George K. Garrett Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
- Berlenbach v. Anderson & Thompson Ski Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- B. F. Gladding & Co., Inc. v. Scientific Anglers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- The Dunlop Company, Limited, and Cross-Appellee v. Kelsey-Hayes Company, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- Congoleum Industries, Inc. v. Armstrong Cork CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- F. E. L. Publications, Ltd. v. Catholic Bishop of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981
- In re Clausen Co. v. Clausen Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
- Reich v. Reed Tool Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.