State v. Flora
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶[1 The offense of attempting to elude a police officer requires proof that the defendant acted “willfully.” This term must be defined in jury instructions upon request because it has a technical meaning in the context of the eluding statute. Without a definitional instruction, appellant James Flora lacked legal support for his legitimate theory that the vehicle he was accused of willfully eluding was not recognizable as a police vehicle. Because the error was not harmless, we reverse.
Becker, J.
f 2 The only witness at trial was Officer Martin Radley of the Swinomish Police Department. He…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. CamarilloWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. MontgomeryWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. BrittonWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- State v. MontgomeryWashington Supreme Court · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- State v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- State v. GossWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- State Of Washington v. Ebrima DarboeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- State Of Washington v. Jonathan Sutley RhoadsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.