Legal Opinion

State v. Goss

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 2016No. 92274-8PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

González, J.

¶1 Those charged with a crime have the constitutional right to know “the nature and cause of the accusation” made against them and the constitutional right to notice of every fact (other than prior convictions) that increases the penalties they face. Wash. Const. art. I, § 22; Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 476, 120 S. Ct. 2348, 147 L. Ed. 2d 435 (2000) (quoting Jones v. United States, 526 U.S. 227, 243 n.6, 119 S. Ct. 1215, 143 L. Ed. 2d 311 (1999)). Michael Goss argues that the charging document the State used to accuse him of second degree child molestation failed to…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Of Washington v. Daren M. MoralesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  2. State v. PierceWashington Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State v. BrooksWashington Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State of Washington v. Evan Wayne SullivanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  5. State v. WhitakerWashington Supreme Court · 2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API