Legal Opinion

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Valdez

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 13, 2016No. 15-20664PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) brought a civil ..complaint against Damian Omar Valdez and his two business entities for federal securities fraud arising out of secured note offerings made to investors. The district court found that Valdez and his business entities violated federal securities laws through the note offerings and by conducting a Ponzi scheme. The district court imposed a third-tier civil monetary penalty under the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77t(d), and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78u(d), in the amount of the *816gross…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. North Alamo Water Supply Corporation v. City of San Juan, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Pentagon Capital Management PLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. KernCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. ColeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. WALLDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API