Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Cole
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided September 8, 2016No. 14-3975-cvUnpublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
In this civil enforcement action, defendants Lee Cole and Linden Boyne, British citizens proceeding pro se, appeal from a final judgment in favor of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), following the entry of a default judgment. Defendants do not challenge the default judgment; they fault only the final judgment for (1) holding them jointly and severally liable for approximately $14.7 million in ordered disgorged profits and prejudgment interest, (2) ordering each individually to pay $7.5 million in civil penalties, and (3) imposing other nonmonetary sanctions. We…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Finkel v. RomanowiczCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. First Jersey Securities, Inc. And Robert E. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Hughes Tool Co. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. YousefCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Howard R. Hughes, and Hughes Tool Company and Raymond M. HollidayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Caledonian Bank Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Ussec v. Imran HusainCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. EnglerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. ChanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020