Legal Opinion
Waldo v. Waldo
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 20, 1883PublishedCited by 10 opinions
Appeal from Ingham. (Gridley, J.) Bell to clear title. Complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.
There is no dispute about the facts in this case so far as it is necessary to consider- them in disposing of the questions raised. Jerome B. Waldo, late of Ingham county, died on the 18th day of- May, 1880. His two children and only heirs at law, the complainant and Mary Allen, claim that at the time of his death he was owner in fee of a large amount of real estate in Ingham county. The defendant (claiming to be his widow) holds the legal' title of record to the real estate in question, through two deeds made to her by Jerome B. Waldo before his death. But the heirs claim that she deeded it…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hale v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1855
- Jones v. GrantNew York Court of Chancery · 1843
- Kirby v. KirbyNew York Court of Chancery · 1828
- Allen v. WaldoMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Prentiss v. HolbrookMichigan Supreme Court · 1852
3Cited by10 opinions
- Independent Wireless Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- DDB Technologies, L.L.C. v. MLB Advanced Media, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- City of El Reno v. Cleveland-Trinidad Paving Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Ohio Casualty Ins. Co. v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.