Legal Opinion

Jones v. Grant

New York Court of Chancery

Decided October 17, 1843PublishedCited by 18 opinions

This case came before the chancellor upon a petition of the executors of D. W. Cole deceased, for an order for summary relief, upon the foot of the decree in this cause, against Allen and Robinson, two of their co-defendants, on the following state of facts : In September, 1835, A. P. Grant, and Cole the intestate, purchased a lot of land in East Oswego, and gave back a mortgage for the purchase money, $3500 and interest, payable to G. Smith in ten annual instalments; but…

Read the full summary

This case came before the chancellor upon a petition of the executors of D. W. Cole deceased, for an order for summary relief, upon the foot of the decree in this cause, against Allen and Robinson, two of their co-defendants, on the following state of facts : In September, 1835, A. P. Grant, and Cole the intestate, purchased a lot of land in East Oswego, and gave back a mortgage for the purchase money, $3500 and interest, payable to G. Smith in ten annual instalments; but which bond and mortgage belonged to Smith and Jones. In December thereafter, Allen and Robinson purchased of Cole his…

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

It is the constant practice of the court to make a decree between co-defendants, according to the justice and equity of the case, founded upon the pleadings and proofs between the complainant and such defendants ; and such was the decision of the house of lords in the case of Chamley v. Lord Dunsany, (2 Sch. & Lef. Rep. 718,) where the decree of Lord Redesdale was affirmed, It is also competent for the court to make a decree between co-defendants for contribution, or a decree over in favor of one defendant against another, founded upon facts stated in the complainant’s bill,…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. The Erie Railway Company v. . RamseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Vance v. EvansWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Hoffman v. RyanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Smith v. HiltonNew York Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Mutual Life Insurance v. United States Hotel Co.New York Supreme Court · 1913

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API