Legal Opinion

Nolop v. Skemp

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1959PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This is a typical case presenting jury questions as to causal negligence and damages. A careful review of the record contains ample evidence to support each of such findings. We cite once more the familiar principle that when a jury’s findings are attacked, particularly when they have had the trial court’s approval, our inquiry is limited to the issue whether there is credible evidence that, under any reasonable view, supports such findings; and in determining the facts the jury may give effect to such inferences as reasonably may be drawn from them. Olson v. Milwaukee Automobile Ins. Co.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Olson v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Commerce Insurance v. Badger Paint & Hardware Stores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Tri City Fur Foods, Inc. v. AmmermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cramer v. Theda Clark Memorial HospitalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Harlow v. ChinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. Rodenbeck v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Berg v. De GreefWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Donlea v. CarpenterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API