Berg v. De Greef
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Connor T. Hansen, J.(1) Was there credible evidence to support the verdict?
Defendant asserts that the negligence of the deceased driver, Roger Vanden Avond, was equal to or greater than that of defendant, Francis De Greef, as a matter of law and predicates this assertion on the premise that the Vanden Avond auto was situated so as to obstruct both lanes of travel of the highway at the time of the accident.
It is well established that a jury’s findings as to negligence apportionment will be sustained if there is any credible evidence which, under any reasonable view, supports such findings.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dickman v. SchaefferWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Zweifel v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Cheetham v. Piggly Wiggly Madison Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Gray v. Wisconsin Telephone Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Gustin v. JohannesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kenwood Equipment, Inc. v. Aetna InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Diener v. Heritage Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Frederick v. Hotel Investments, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Leibl v. St. Mary's Hospital of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Hikade v. ErnstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.