Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 7, 1999PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FLAHERTY, Judge.

Keith Curtis (Claimant) appeals from the order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the Workers’ Compensation Judge’s (WCJ) granting of Berley Electric Company’s (Employer) Petition for Suspension which raises for the first time the issue of whether a claimant’s total disability benefits may be suspended under the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) when he voluntarily inflicts an incapacitating injury to himself which prevents the possibility of his returning to the work force. 1 We affirm.

On September 27, 1988, while employed as an…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Dillon v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Banic v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Muse v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. J.A. Hart v. WCAB (Dominion Transmission, Inc. and Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API