Commonwealth v. Anderson
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
KLEIN, J.:
¶ 1 Steven Anderson appeals the trial court’s decision to deny his motion to dismiss pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Criminal Procedure 600 in which he claimed the Commonwealth did not use due diligence in bringing his case to trial under the rule. After a thorough review of the record, we affirm. 1
¶ 2 Here, the mechanical run date was December 9, 2005. The matter was listed for trial on December 1, 2005. None of the subsequent continuances could have been avoided despite due diligence of the Commonwealth, so there was no violation of Rule 600. The history of the further…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CrowleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. HawkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. ManleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. AfricaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RolesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. RileySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. ListonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Com. v. Banks, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Com. v. Berryhill, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.