Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Liston

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 31, 2008No. 100 WAL 2008PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

AND NOW, this 31th day of October, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:

a. Did the Superior Court contradict Commonwealth v. Grant in purporting to create its own new exception to that case?

b. Did the Superior Court contradict Commonwealth v. Reaves by holding that any PCRA petitioner entitled to a nunc pro tunc direct appeal is automatically entitled to nunc pro tunc post sentence motions as well, without proving prejudice?

c. Did the Superior Court usurp this Court’s exclusive authority to create procedural rules under Article…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. AndersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. MooreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Commonwealth v. MooreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Commonwealth v. Robinson, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API