McDaniel v. Yuba County
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the Tenth District. The Court overruled the demurrer, and after trial, gave final judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
The plaintiff sued the defendant to recover a sum of money agreed by express contract to be paid him by the Supervisors, as Examining Physician of the hospital for the county for one year, from the 17th October, 1856, to 17th October, 1857. The complaint avers that he entered upon the duties of the office or appointment, and was ready to perform at all times the duties imposed by the contract as they should be required.
The defendant demurred, and at the same time answered. The answer was general, denying the contract, rendition of the services, etc. and the demurrer denied the right to…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Patton v. Board of Health Etc.California Supreme Court · 1899
- Curtin v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- State ex rel. Kendall v. ColeNevada Supreme Court · 1915
- Pacific Finance Corp. v. City of LynwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- People Ex Rel. Attorney-General v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.