Legal Opinion
State v. Smith
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided October 28, 1938No. 30305PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMessmore, J.
This is an action by the state of Nebraska against Homer Smith and others, doing business as a partnership under the name of the New Deal Transport Line, and Carl A. Asimus and Tony Asimus. The partners are alleged to have been engaged in the use and distribution of motor vehicle fuels, and Carl A. Asimus and Tony Asimus are sureties on the bond furnished to the state of Nebraska, to recover excise taxes, due the state upon motor vehicle fuels under the terms and provisions of House Roll No. 6, enacted by the Fifty-first session of the Nebraska legislature. Laws 1935, Special Session, ch. 16.
P…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Minnesota v. BlasiusSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Ozark Pipe Line Corp. v. MonierSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- State ex rel. English v. RubackNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
- Rodgers v. JohnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
- Lewis v. KingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Best & Co. v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
- Standard Oil Company, an Indiana Corporation v. Edward H. Kurtz, Trustee of Meadow Rock Company, BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- Frank v. RussellNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
- United States Cold Storage Corp. v. StolinskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
- State v. GalyenNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.