Legal Opinion

State v. Galyen

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1985No. 85-332PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKrivosha, C.J.

Although brought in the form of a criminal prosecution, this appeal concerns the constitutionality of Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 54-2113 et seq. (Reissue 1984).

The appellant, Richard Galyen, was convicted of failing to pay a fee of 25 cents per head on cattle sold, as required by the provisions of §§ 54-2113 et seq. Galyen orally moved the Holt County Court, where the action was filed, to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that §§ 54-2113 et seq. violate both Neb. Const, art. VIII and U.S. Const, amend. XIV. The Holt County Court found the statute to be unconstitutional on both grounds and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bowman v. Continental Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Anderson v. TiemannNebraska Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State Ex Rel. Douglas v. Nebraska Mortgage Finance FundNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. United Community Services v. Omaha National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Gossman v. State Employees Retirement SystemNebraska Supreme Court · 1964

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. GarzaNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Waste Connections of Nebraska, Inc. v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Banks v. HeinemanNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Bahensky v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Bahensky v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API