Frank v. Russell
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtYeager, J.
Here are two actions which were tried together but not consolidated. One is by Owen A. Frank and Dorothy H. Frank, plaintiffs and appellants, against Wray Mack Russell and Marjorie Glandon Russell, defendants and appellees. The action is one for the purpose of enjoining erection of a residential building on Lot 6 and the south half of Lot 5, Block 7, Bungalow Addition to the City of Scottsbluff, Nebraska, with its east end or side less than 40 feet, or only 27 feet, west of the east line of the described property. The injunction was denied and from the judgment the Franks have appealed to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Furstenberg v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1937
- State v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
- Bleicher v. HeeterNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
- Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co. v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
- Rawlings v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
3Cited by18 opinions
- Cromwell v. WardCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Bowman v. City of YorkNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- Whitehead Oil Co. v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Weber v. City of Grand IslandNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
- Eastroads, L.L.C. v. Omaha Zoning Board of AppealsNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.