Legal Opinion

Commissioner v. Bookstein

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 3, 1941No. Nos. 8629, 8628PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONS, Circuit Judge.

Upon the determination and assessment of a deficiency by the Commissioner in taxes of the respondents for the calendar year 1934, the question arose whether, as in Helvering v. Hammel, 6 Cir., 108 F.2d 753, re*997versed 311 U.S. 504, 61 S.Q. 368, 85 L.Ed. 303, 131 A.L.R. 1481, a loss sustained by the taxpayers through the foreclosure of mortgaged real estate was an ordinary loss deductible to its full extent, or was a capital loss limited to $2,000 under the provisions of § 117(d) of the Revenue Act of 1934, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Acts, page 708. The Board of Tax Appeals held…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Helvering v. HammelSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Electro-Chemical Engraving Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. CL Gransden & Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  4. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. HammelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
  5. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hudson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953
  2. England-Cook Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  3. Hudson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API