Commissioner v. Bookstein
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, Circuit Judge.
Upon the determination and assessment of a deficiency by the Commissioner in taxes of the respondents for the calendar year 1934, the question arose whether, as in Helvering v. Hammel, 6 Cir., 108 F.2d 753, re*997versed 311 U.S. 504, 61 S.Q. 368, 85 L.Ed. 303, 131 A.L.R. 1481, a loss sustained by the taxpayers through the foreclosure of mortgaged real estate was an ordinary loss deductible to its full extent, or was a capital loss limited to $2,000 under the provisions of § 117(d) of the Revenue Act of 1934, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Acts, page 708. The Board of Tax Appeals held…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Helvering v. HammelSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Electro-Chemical Engraving Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- CL Gransden & Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. HammelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hudson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953
- England-Cook Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Hudson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953