Legal Opinion

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Hawkins

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 16, 1937No. 8397PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

This case presents merely a question of whether petitioners were entitled to take a deduction on their returns from 1932 for a loss occasioned by the foreclosure of a mortgage and consequent sale of a large tract of land in California in 1931. The facts are not in dispute. The Board in a well-considered opinion, reported in 34 B. T.A. 918, carefully reviewed the law and held that the loss did not occur until the end of the redemption period in 1932.

We concur in the ruling of the Board. The petition is denied and the judgment of the Board is affirmed.

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. BooksteinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  2. Hadley Falls Trust Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1938
  3. Great Plains Gasification Assocs. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2006
  4. Harris v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  5. Binz Hide & Tallow Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API