Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 7, 1984No. C82-09-37581; CA A28101PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Defendant appeals from a conviction for attempted theft by extortion. He testified on his own behalf. He assigns as error the trial court’s admission of evidence of his previous first degree theft conviction. The evidence was used to impeach his credibility as a witness. We affirm.

Although he had earlier been found guilty of theft in the first degree, ORS 164.055, a Class C felony, defendant argues that, because the conviction had been given misdemeanor treatment by the sentencing judge, it lacks the requisite felony status to be an impeachment crime under OEC 609:

“For the purpose of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. KesslerOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. CardenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. EwellCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
  3. State v. EwellCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API