Legal Opinion

State v. Hamilton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 15, 1982No. 82-0040, CA A24210PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

The state appeals from a pretrial order that evidence of defendant’s prior conviction for Unauthorized Use of a Motor Vehicle (UUMV) was not admissible for the purpose of impeaching defendant’s testimony. Defendant was charged in a two-count district attorney’s information with the commission of attempted arson of a police vehicle in violation of ORS 164.325, and attempted criminal mischief against another police vehicle in violation of ORS 164.365.

Before trial, on motion of both sides, the trial court conducted an omnibus hearing to determine the admissibility of two different statements…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. KoenneckeOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. HoareCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  3. State v. CardenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. State v. PfortmillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. FearsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  2. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. State v. ReichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API