State v. Ewell
Court of Appeals of Utah
1ConcurrenceJackson, Judge
I concur with the result reached today. However, I write separately to point out that the term “convicted,” as used in Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-203(4) (1990), means the establishment of guilt, not the imposition of the judgment and sentence upon a finding of guilt. While I recognize that the word “convicted” is used in either context in various statutes and procedural rules,1 it is apparent that the legislature used the term “convict*1364ed” in the enhancement statute at issue to mean the establishment of guilt.
The legislature chose to require that a person be “sentenced” to a term of imprisonment…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Moore v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States v. Orestes Luciano Abreu, United States of America v. James David ThornbrughCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
- Padilla v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. AkanaHawaii Supreme Court · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.