Legal Opinion
Dryden v. Dryden
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 16, 1993No. 92 CA 533PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Stephenson, Judge.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered by the Adams County Court of Common Pleas in favor of Harold and Jean Dryden, plaintiffs below and appellees herein. Karen D. Dryden, defendant below and appellant herein, assigns the following errors for our review:
“1. The court erred in granting Summary Judgment to the Plaintiffs herein in view of the fact that the Defendant herein had denied specifically and continues to categorically deny that that is her signature on the exhibit attached to the Complaint herein.
“2. The court erred in granting Summary Judgment in the face…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Bostic v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Bates & Springer, Inc. v. StallworthOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
- Ingersoll-Rand Financial Corp. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bank of Am., N.A. v. CallowayOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Green Tree Servicing, L.L.C. v. RobertsOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Romano's Carryout, Inc. v. P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Santomieri v. MangenOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Taylor v. UhlOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.