Legal Opinion

State v. . Warren

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 30, 1947PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The defendant Loftin, night watchman and one of the conspirators, was called as a witness for the prosecution. On cross-examination he stated that nothing had been offered him to turn State’s evidence: “Not a thing was offered to me to make this statement.”

In reply, on redirect examination, the record discloses the following:

“Q. Now, Mr. Loftin, have yon ever been offered money not to go on tbe stand in this case? Defendants object. Overruled; exception.
“A. Well, I can’t say exactly that I have, but it was talked.
“Court: Well, who talked to you?
“A. It was different ones.
“Q. Any of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. State v. . SawyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. State v. . HamptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. GoldbergSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. State v. HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. State v. PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. State v. LoveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. State v. BurnsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API