Legal Opinion

State v. Hicks

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 2, 1951No. 505PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEeviN, J.

It is an ancient and basic principle of criminal jurisprudence that no one shall be twice put in jeopardy for the same offense. S. v. Mansfield, 207 N.C. 233, 176 S.E. 761. Several criteria have been prescribed by the authorities for determining in diverse situations whether two indictments are for the same offense. The one applicable on the present record is the “same-evidence test,” which is somewhat alternative in character. It is simply this : Whether the facts alleged in the second indictment, if given in evidence, would have sustained a conviction under the first indictment (S. v.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. State v. . BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. State v. . StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. State v. . NashSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  4. State v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. State v. . KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. State v. IrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. State v. GoldbergSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. State v. MintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. State v. BirckheadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. State v. FurrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API