Legal Opinion

Cobb v. Juneau Telephone Co.

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided February 14, 1919No. 1801-APublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JENNINGS, District Judge.

I find from the evidence in this case that the telephones were disconnected on May 10th, and that at that time nothing had been paid for the months of March and April.

I find that the telephone company had the rule as. alleged. I also find that such rule was reasonable and enforceable. The Supreme Court of the United States, speaking of such rules, say: •

“Like regulations often have been pronounced reasonable and valid in other jurisdictions, and while some differences of opinion upon the subject were disclosed in reported decisions, the weight of authority was on that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Southwestern Telegraph & Telephone Co. v. DanaherSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Wood v. City of AuburnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1895
  3. Crumley v. Watauga Water Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Watauga Water Co. v. WolfeTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Kerr, County Clerk v. State Ex Rel. WimbishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Coosa Valley Telephone Company v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  2. Coosa Valley Telephone Company v. MartinAlabama Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. Coosa Valley Telephone Company v. MartinAlabama Court of Appeals · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API