Legal Opinion

Watauga Water Co. v. Wolfe

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1897PublishedCited by 18 opinions

PROM WASHINGTON. Appeal from Law Court of Washington County. H. T. Campbell, J.

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.

C. H. Wolfe brought this suit against the Watauga Water Company and obtained judgment before the Circuit Judge, sitting without a jury, for $10, as damages for its refusal to furnish him water at his residence in Johnson City. The company appealed in error.

The defendant is a water company, chartered under the general laws, of the State (Code, annotated by Shannon, §§ 2499-2506), with the right of eminent domain and all essential powers, privileges, and franchises, and operating its waterworks at Johnson City under special contract with that city to furnish it and its inhabitants with- water…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Spring Valley Water Works v. SchottlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Lowell v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  3. Shepard v. Milwaukee Gas Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Central Union Telephone Co. v. State ex rel. FalleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Williams v. Mutual Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Leavitt v. Lassen Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Hatch v. Consumers Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Farmer v. Mayor of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Seaton Mountain Electric Light, Heat & Power Co. v. Idaho Springs Investment Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1910

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API