Legal Opinion

Coosa Valley Telephone Company v. Martin

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 17, 1961No. 7 Div. 623Published

1Opinion of the Court

CATES, Judge.

The telephone company is appealing from a judgment for $100 in favor of Martin, a practicing dentist in Pell City, in an action filed because of the company’s stopping his telephone service.

In'1955 the St. Clair County Telephone Company was serving Pell City Alabama. At the end of that year the Coosa Valley Telephone Company bought the assets of the St. Clair company and was authorized by the Alabama Public Service Commission to serve the Pell City area.

The new company made its bills for service payable in advance, whereas •• the predecessor had billed in arrears. Thus/ in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Milwaukee Mechanics Ins. Co. v. MaplesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. Cumberland Telegraph & Telephone Co. v. HobartMississippi Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Louisville Tobacco Warehouse Co. v. Louisville Water Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  4. Birmingham Waterworks Co. v. DavisAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Hiers v. Southeastern Carolinas Telephone Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API