In Re Disciplinary Action Against Erickson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
In this case we review the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the referee’s finding that Respondent David T. Erickson failed to cooperate with the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility in the investigation of a complaint which was ultimately dismissed. We hold that the Director proved noncooperation by clear and convincing evidence, and that the referee’s finding of fact that Erickson “repeatedly and intentionally failed to cooperate with the Director’s investigation into alleged misconduct by Respondent” is supported by the evidence. We also review the…
3Cases cited20 opinions
- In Re the Discipline of CartwrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- In Re the Disbarment of GillardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against WestbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- In Re Complaint Concerning Judge McDonoughSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against EngelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against AlbrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against AitkenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- In re Disciplinary Action Against VossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- In re Disciplinary Action Against LetourneauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- In re Disciplinary Action Against O'BrienSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.