Legal Opinion

Kuhn v. Look-Stub Check Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 16, 1908No. 24PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. On appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York sustaining a demurrer to the bill on the ground that the patent in suit is void for lack of invention.

1Opinion of the Court

COXE, Circuit Judge.

The patent in controversy, No. 705,228, was granted to William A. Force for a printing die. The object of the alleged invention is to fasten the rubber type-block securely to the handle of the die and is sufficiently illustrated- by the claims, which are as follows:

“(I) A metallic handle for type-blocks provided with flanges, set in position to embrace a type-block, and adapted to be brought into rigid, unyielding engagement with llie block when pressed together.
“(2) A metallic handle for type-blocks, provided with flanges, having gripping edges on their ends, the flanges…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reckendorfer v. FaberSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Richards v. Chase Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Rubber-Tip Pencil Co. v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Fowler v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
  5. Conley v. MarumU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Krell Auto Grand Piano Co. v. Story & Clark Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1913
  2. Bonnie-B Co. v. GiguetDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1919
  3. Ceasar v. Joseph Pernick Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1932
  4. Fernald v. Oneida Nat. Chuck Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API