Legal Opinion
Ceasar v. Joseph Pernick Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 23, 1932No. 6330PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
This is a motion to dismiss the bill of complaint filed herein and for an order and decree to such effect on the ground that neither of the claims of the United States patent No. 1,571,930 referred to in the bill of complaint is infringed by either of the devices illustrated as Exhibits A and B of the defendant’s interrogatories filed with the clerk of this court on July 2, 1932, which devices the parties agree, as indicated by the defendant’s interrogatories and the answers thereto dated July 18, 1932, are the devices alleged to infringe.
By this motion under Rule 29…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. American Fur Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Richards v. Chase Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. CramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Weil v. N. J. Richman Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940
- Bradt v. Kelsey-Hayes Wheel Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1936