Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Stinson

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 21, 2012No. Misc. Docket AG Nos. AG 30 and 70PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-751,1 the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland (“Petitioner”), acting through Bar *153Counsel, filed a Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action against Katrice Selena Stinson (“Respondent”), a Maryland attorney who alleged she had offices in the State. Petitioner charged that Stinson committed professional misconduct arising out of the fees she charged to two clients, Dr. Rose Merchant and Kara McIntosh. Based on Respondent’s conduct in the Merchant complaint, Petitioner charged Respondent with violating Rules 1.4 (Communication),2 1.5 (Fees),3 *1541.15…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. AwuahCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  2. State v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MonfriedCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. DavyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SperlingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  5. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. SteinhornCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API