Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Chapman

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 31, 2013No. Misc. Docket AG No. 44PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBattaglia, J.

Gerald Frederick Chapman, Respondent, was admitted to the Bar of this Court on May 24, 1979. On October 25, 2011, the Attorney Grievance Commission (“Bar Counsel”), acting pursuant to Maryland Rule leATilla),1 filed a “Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action” against Chapman, which incorporated two separate complaints filed by Ms. Barbara Bogarosh and Mr. John Butler. The factual bases of these charges arose out of Chapman’s consulting agreement with James Weiskerger to perform loan-modification work through Chapman’s law firm, Chapman Law Group, LLC. Through this arrangement, Bar…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MonfriedCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. De La PazCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. Van NelsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. LaraCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HodesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  2. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. SperlingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. AllenbaughCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MixterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ShapiroCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API