Legal Opinion

Carson v. Jackson Land & Mining Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1922PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Harrison County. Action by George R. Carson against the Jackson Land & Mining Company and others. Demurrer to declaration sustained, and plaintiff, not desiring to amend, judgment of nil capiat was rendered, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Ritz, Judge:

This suit was instituted for the purpose of recovering damages for the death of plaintiff’s intestate from a fall through a bridge, which it is claimed the defendants were under the duty to keep in good order and repair. The court below sustained a demurrer to the declaration as amended, and the plaintiff, not desiring to further amend, a judgment of nil capiat was rendered, to review which this writ óf error is prosecuted.

The declaration as amended alleges that in .the year 1911 ■the defendants were the owners of a tract or parcel of land situate near the city of Clarksburg, ■…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Bellevue v. DalyIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Cook v. TottenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Hammond v. HammondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  4. Kirkland v. PitmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  5. Brill v. . BrillNew York Court of Appeals · 1888

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nielson v. SandbergUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Whalen v. RuizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Hayes v. TompkinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  4. Greiner v. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1999
  5. Moran v. EdmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API