Legal Opinion
Hayes v. Tompkins
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided December 2, 1985No. 0585PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Goolsby, Judge:
The issues in this property case tried in equity are whether Furman Hayes owns an easement of right-of-way over land owned by Samuel D. Tompkins and June J. Tompkins and whether Hayes should bear one-third the costs of maintaining and repairing the road embraced by any easement of right-of-way he might own. Hayes and the Tompkinses appeal. We affirm.
Hayes brought suit to enjoin the Tompkinses and the defendant Leota B. Johnson from obstructing a road over which Hayes claimed an easement of right-of-way. The Tompkinses and Johnson denied Hayes had an easement over the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Carolina Land Company, Inc. v. BlandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
- Bina v. BinaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
- Brasington v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
- Steele v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Beck v. MangelsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Buck Mountain Owners' Ass'n v. PrestwichCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Story v. BlyColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
- Los Vigiles Land Grant v. Rebar Haygood Ranch, LLCNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
- Morrow v. DychesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.