Legal Opinion

Gramling, Spalding & Co. v. Pool

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 7, 1900PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Money rule. Before Judge Janes. Douglas superior court. November term, 1899.

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

It appears that the litigation between the parties-to this case has been pending in court for a number of years. The plaintiffs in this case filed their bill in December, 1885,, as creditors by open account of the firm of Turner & Hudson, against said firm, which was composed of G. R. Turner and Allen Hudson, and also against W. H. Pool and others, for injunction, receiver, and other equitable relief. That bill, among other things, alleged that Turner and Hudson were insolvent traders, and attacked as fraudulent and void a deed from G. R. Turner to W. H. Pool, dated March 19, 1884. That…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Southern Mutual Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  2. Pool v. Gramling, Spalding & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  3. Cheapstead v. FrankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  4. Lilly v. DeLaperiereSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Maloy v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  2. Richter v. Atlantic CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  3. Daniel v. Citizens & Southern National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  4. Macon, Dublin & Savannah Railroad v. MusgroveSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  5. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. PuckettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API