Pool v. Gramling, Spalding & Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Equity. Debtor and creditor. Insolvent trader. Practice. Exceptions to master’s report. Jury. Charge of court. Tender. Fraud. Yerdict.. Before Judge Richard II. Clark. Douglas superior coui’t. January term, 1891.
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed.
On December 28, 1885, Gramling, Spalding & Co. et al., creditors by open account of tbe firm of Turner & Hudson (composed of G. R. Turner and Allen Hudson), filed their bill against that firm and against W. II. Pool, E. L. Ergle, Samuel Turner and the sheriff, for injunction, receiver and other equitable relief. In this bill the complainants alleged that Turner & Hudson were insolvent traders, and attacked as fraudulent and void a deed from G. R. Turner to W. H. Pool, dated March 19, 1884, and recorded December 18, 1885, and a mortgage from Turner & Hudson to E. L. Ergle,…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Sheffield v. LewisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Kidd v. KiddSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Gramling, Spalding & Co. v. PoolSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Mercer v. BraswellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- New York Life Insurance v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.