Legal Opinion

City of Fresno v. Maroot

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 9, 1987No. F006238PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN, (G. A.), P. J.

—This is the second appeal in this eminent domain case. In the first appeal we reversed a summary judgment in favor of Charles J. Maroot, Jr., and Judith Ann Maroot (Maroot) enforcing a purported settlement agreement between the City of Fresno (City) and the landowners, Maroot. The nonpublished opinion is numbered F002200.

The purported settlement agreement provided for the payment by the City to the landowners, Maroot, of $315,000 for the damages suffered by Maroot by reason of the condemnation of their property, which included a restaurant known as Jon Jon’s. A…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Corkland v. BoscoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Fiore v. AlvordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Datatronic Systems Corp. v. Speron, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1986

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Weddington Productions, Inc. v. FlickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Levy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. In Re Marriage of AssemiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Provost v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Murphy v. PadillaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API