C.E. Equipment Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RADER, Judge.
Plaintiffs — C.E. Equipment Co., Inc. (C.E.) and Harco Corporation — are respectively the assignee and licensee of United States Patent No. 3,725,669, “Deep Anode Bed for Cathodic Protection,” (the ’669 patent). Under 28 U.S.C. § 1498(a) (1982), plaintiffs seek “reasonable and entire compensation” from the United States for infringement of the ’669 patent. The ’669 patent defines a method and apparatus for protecting buried metallic structures from corrosion. In particular, the ’669 patent purports to disclose a novel method for replacing spent anodes.
Plaintiffs moved for…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Autogiro Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Loctite Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Ultraseal Ltd., Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chemical Separation Technology, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Knorr-Bremse Systeme Fuer Nutzfahrzeuge GmbH v. Dana Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001
- Bailey v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1998