Legal Opinion
In Re Regent
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 9, 1999No. 95-BG-875PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
This case is before us on the Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility (the Board) recom mending that respondent Annette Regent be disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. The Board found grounds for disbarment based on violations of three Rules of Professional Conduct, 8.1(a), 8.1(b), and 8.4(c). 1
Respondent was admitted to the State Bar of Hawaii and the Bar of the District of Columbia. On May 23, 1995, the Supreme Court of the State of Hawaii disbarred respondent. The charges arose from respondent’s submission of false and misleading…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re GilbertDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- In Re DelateDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- In Re WebsterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Matter of DorseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- In re WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re DemosDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re LeeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- In Re ScottDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- In re PlagmannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022