Legal Opinion

Ritter v. . Barrett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 5, 1838PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We are of opinion that there was error in refusing to instruct the jury, as prayed by the defendant's counsel, that they were at liberty to disregard the distance called for in the first line of the deed of the lessors of the plaintiff to John Sowell, and to extend that line to the pine, the terminus called for in the deed of Jacob McLindon to Isaac Sowell. In the case of Campbell v. McArthur, 2 Hawks, 33, it was recognized as a settled principle that a mistake in the course or distance of a deed shall not be permitted to disappoint the intent of the parties, if that intent appears, and if…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Den on Dem. of Everitt v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1840
  2. Doe on Demise of Cooper v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1854
  3. Henley v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lee v. McDonaldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Whiteheart v. GrubbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Craven County v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Lewis v. . FurrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. Moore v. WhitleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API