Lee v. McDonald
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.
The defendants except and assign as error the refusal of the court to charge the jury in substance as follows: That a particular description in a deed by metes and bounds which is unambiguous, will control over a reference to lots when there is a discrepancy or ambiguity between the two descriptions.
The intent of a grantor in a deed, like that of a testator in a will, must be gathered from its four corners, and it is the duty of the court to decide as a matter of law, what the boundaries are in a deed, and for the jury to determine where they are actually located. Gudger v. White, 141 N.C.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Gudger v. White.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Cox v. . McGowanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Doe on Demise of Campbell v. DoeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1822
- Quelch v. . FutchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Carter v. . WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Root v. Allstate Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Stephens Co. v. LiskSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Whiteheart v. GrubbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Franklin v. FaulknerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Young v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.