Legal Opinion

Southern California Rapid Transit District v. Bolen

California Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1992No. S015986PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARABIAN, J.

The principal question before us is whether the equal protection guarantees of the state and federal Constitutions are violated by a statute conditioning the right to vote on the ownership of real property and alloting votes on the basis of its assessed value. We hold that, under the narrow circumstances presented, such a voting scheme is reasonably related to the objectives of the statute and thus survives constitutional scrutiny.

I

A

The Southern California Rapid Transit District (hereafter SCRTD or transit district) is the lead agency for the construction, financing, and…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Bullock v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Shirley Pittman, Individually and as Class Representatives v. Chicago Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  2. City of Marina v. Board of Trustees of California State UniversityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Greene v. Marin County Flood Control & Water Conservation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Cornelius v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. City of San Diego v. ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API