Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael Reddick

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 13, 1995No. 706, Docket 94-1245PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVAL, Circuit Judge:

This appeal raises the question of the entitlement of an indigent criminal defendant in the federal courts to appointment of counsel under the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A, for the making of a post-appeal motion for reduction of sentence by reason of a subsequent change in the United States Sentencing Guidelines pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).

On May 27, 1992, under a plea agreement, Michael Reddick pleaded guilty to a two-count superseding information charging him with distribution of LSD under 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and money laundering under 18 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. John T. Dirring v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1965
  4. Burrell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Raymond Miranda v. United States of America, Docket No. Mr-4915Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. Malcolm Jones WhitebirdCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. FormanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. WebbCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  4. People v. RouseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. United States of America, and U.S. District Court Western District of New York v. Darnyl ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API