United States v. Michael Reddick
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LEVAL, Circuit Judge:
This appeal raises the question of the entitlement of an indigent criminal defendant in the federal courts to appointment of counsel under the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A, for the making of a post-appeal motion for reduction of sentence by reason of a subsequent change in the United States Sentencing Guidelines pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).
On May 27, 1992, under a plea agreement, Michael Reddick pleaded guilty to a two-count superseding information charging him with distribution of LSD under 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and money laundering under 18 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- John T. Dirring v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1965
- Burrell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- Raymond Miranda v. United States of America, Docket No. Mr-4915Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. Malcolm Jones WhitebirdCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. FormanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. WebbCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- People v. RouseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- United States of America, and U.S. District Court Western District of New York v. Darnyl ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.